“65” is a sci-fi adventure film directed by Adam Wingard, starring Adam Driver as Mills and Ariana Greenblatt as Koa. The premise of the film sounded intriguing, with Mills and Koa stranded on Earth 65 million years ago, facing dangerous prehistoric creatures in a fight for survival. However, the film failed to deliver on its potential and instead appeared to be a lackluster and uneventful experience.
One of the most significant issues with “65” was the pacing. The serious tone of the film could have been engaging, but the slow and meandering plot made it difficult to stay invested in the story. There was a sense of emptiness to the world, making it difficult to connect with the characters and care about their survival. The lack of character development further compounded this issue, making it challenging to invest in Mills and Koa’s journey.
The visuals of the film were also a letdown. Despite the high budget, the special effects and CGI felt outdated and unimpressive. The prehistoric creatures, while interesting, were not as awe-inspiring as they could have been, and some even looked artificial. The environments and landscapes, though occasionally beautiful, were not enough to make up for the lack of action and character development.
Adam Driver’s performance as Mills was one of the few bright spots in the film, but it was not enough to save it. The serious tone of the movie could have lent itself to a great performance, but the lack of character development made it difficult to connect with his character. Ariana Greenblatt’s performance as Koa was also decent, but the character’s potential was not fully realized.
One of the most disappointing aspects of “65” was how different it was from the trailer. The trailer promised a serious and intense survival situation, with a focus on the characters’ journey. However, the final product lacked the tension and excitement that the trailer implied. It felt like the filmmakers were more focused on creating a serious tone than on making an engaging and captivating film.
The film’s serious tone was not necessarily a bad thing, but it seemed to take away from the overall experience. It was almost as if the filmmakers were trying too hard to be serious, forgetting that it is essential to balance that tone with action and excitement.
Moreover, the lack of action in “65” was another significant problem. While the prehistoric creatures were interesting, the lack of action made it feel like the characters were simply walking around an empty landscape. It would have been great to see some more intense action sequences that would have made the characters’ survival even more thrilling.
In addition, the film’s director, Adam Wingard, is known for his work on horror films, such as “You’re Next” and “The Guest.” While the serious tone of “65” is different from his previous works, it felt like he was trying to incorporate his style into the film, which did not work well. It is admirable that he attempted to do something different, but it did not pay off.
“65” was a disappointing film. The serious tone of the movie could have made for a great experience, but the slow pacing, lack of character development, and unimpressive visuals made it difficult to recommend. The movie failed to deliver on its potential, and it felt like a missed opportunity to create a compelling and thrilling sci-fi adventure.
